The tech visionary behind SpaceX and Tesla and the owner of X, Elon Musk is once again making headlines, but this time not for his ambitious ventures in space or electric cars. Instead, he’s embroiled in a legal dispute with OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, alleging a breach of their non-profit agreement.
Meanwhile, the lawsuit claims that OpenAI’s shift towards commercial interests, particularly with tech giant Microsoft, contradicts its original mission of developing AI for the benefit of humanity.
Elon Musk Sues Sam Altman & OpenAI For Alleged Betrayal
Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman centers on the alleged betrayal of their founding principles. Musk, in a recent filing, contends that the company’s recent partnership with Microsoft has veered it off course from its initial goal of promoting open-source artificial general intelligence (AGI) for the greater good.
In addition, he accuses OpenAI of transforming into a closed-source entity driven by profit, rather than advancing technology for humanity’s benefit. Notably, this recent development has sparked discussions in the artificial technology (AI) sector, especially amid the growing demand for AI services globally.
Meanwhile, Musk’s lawsuit, filed in San Francisco Superior Court, outlines several grievances, including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and unfair business practices. Besides, he demands that OpenAI revert to its open-source ethos and seeks an injunction to prevent the exploitation of AGI technology for profit.
According to Musk, the release of GPT-4 in March 2023 marked a significant departure from OpenAI’s principles. Despite being touted as a milestone in AI advancement, GPT-4 remains a closed model, contrary to previous iterations. Musk alleges that this shift towards proprietary technology serves Microsoft’s financial interests, undermining the original intent of OpenAI’s non-profit status.
Also Read: Tom Emmer Slams SEC’s Gary Gensler For Illegal Rulemaking Amid SAB 121 Controversy
Criticism Intensifies Amid OpenAI’s Board Reshuffle
Elon Musk further criticizes the composition of OpenAI’s current board, which he claims lacks the technical expertise necessary to oversee AGI development responsibly. He points to the 2023 firing and subsequent reinstatement of CEO Sam Altman as indicative of a profit-driven agenda, orchestrated to align with Microsoft’s interests.
Meanwhile, the lawsuit underscores Musk’s concerns about the potential risks posed by unchecked AGI development in the hands of profit-driven entities. He warns that prioritizing commercial gain over ethical considerations could have far-reaching implications for public safety and the future of AI technology.
However, amid this ongoing legal heat, OpenAI is preparing to appoint new board members. This move comes as the company navigates through regulatory investigations and internal leadership turmoil.
Altman’s reinstatement as CEO in November followed a period of upheaval, with several board members resigning. Notably, regulatory scrutiny has intensified, with the SEC reportedly investigating internal communications to determine if investors were misled during the leadership upheaval.
Also Read: Portal Price Tanks 50% Soon After Airdrop, What’s Ahead?
The post Breaking: Elon Musk Sues Sam Altman & OpenAI Over Breach Of Agreement appeared first on CoinGape.
Earn more PRC tokens by sharing this post. Copy and paste the URL below and share to friends, when they click and visit Parrot Coin website you earn: https://parrotcoin.net0
PRC Comment Policy
Your comments MUST BE constructive with vivid and clear suggestion relating to the post.
Your comments MUST NOT be less than 5 words.
Do NOT in any way copy/duplicate or transmit another members comment and paste to earn. Members who indulge themselves copying and duplicating comments, their earnings would be wiped out totally as a warning and Account deactivated if the user continue the act.
Parrot Coin does not pay for exclamatory comments Such as hahaha, nice one, wow, congrats, lmao, lol, etc are strictly forbidden and disallowed. Kindly adhere to this rule.
Constructive REPLY to comments is allowed