In a swift response to growing concerns over potential conflicts of interest, the Ethereum Foundation announced an accelerated effort to establish a formal policy. This initiative comes after revelations that two of its researchers received “significant” incentives from EigenLayer, prompting a broader discussion on the need for clear governance frameworks within the organization.
Ethereum Foundation Ramps Up Conflict Policy Work
The Ethereum Foundation, under the stewardship of Executive Director Aya Miyaguchi, has recognized the inadequacy of relying solely on culture and individual judgment to mitigate conflicts of interest. Miyaguchi, in a recent statement on X, emphasized the importance of the Foundation’s neutrality in maintaining its pivotal role in the Ethereum ecosystem. She revealed that while the development of a formal policy had been underway, the current discourse has necessitated an acceleration of these efforts. An update on the policy, she assured, would be shared with the community soon.
Meanwhile, Lefteris Karapetsas, a former Ethereum software engineer and the founder of crypto portfolio tracking tool Rotki, voiced that the Foundation should provide adequate compensation to its staff. He argued that sufficient internal rewards would prevent the need for team members to seek external compensation, which could lead to conflicts of interest.
EigenLayer Innovates in Ether Staking Space
The issue came to light when Justin Drake, an Ethereum Foundation researcher, disclosed his advisory role with the Eigen Foundation on May 19. Accompanying the role was a substantial incentive in EIGEN tokens, potentially worth more than all his other assets combined, primarily ETH. Drake stated that these tokens, accruing over three years, represented millions of dollars. He committed to reinvesting all proceeds into the Ethereum ecosystem, either as investments or donations, with a focus solely on researching restaking risks.
This disclosure prompted Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin to engage in a public discussion with Jordan Fish, also known as Cobie, a prominent crypto trader. The dialogue centered on the potential conflicts of interest arising from Ethereum Foundation members taking advisory positions at EigenLayer. Buterin’s involvement underscored the high stakes and sensitive nature of governance and ethical practices within major cryptocurrency organizations.
Just two days after Drake’s disclosure, Dankrad Feist, another researcher at the Foundation, announced a similar advisory position with EigenLayer. He clarified that he acted in a personal capacity, focusing on risks and decentralization, and was fully prepared to adopt contrarian views on EigenLayer. Unlike Drake, Feist did not pledge any financial reinvestments into the community, which highlighted the varied approaches among Foundation members towards handling external engagements.
EigenLayer itself is a burgeoning platform that allows users to deposit and re-stake ether from various liquid staking tokens. The platform aims to allocate these funds to secure third-party networks or actively validated services, representing a significant innovation in the staking landscape.
Also Read: US Inflation News: Bitcoin Rises As New Data Raises Hopes For Early Fed Rate Cuts
The post Ethereum Foundation Addresses EigenLayer Token Dilemma appeared first on CoinGape.
Earn more PRC tokens by sharing this post. Copy and paste the URL below and share to friends, when they click and visit Parrot Coin website you earn: https://parrotcoin.net0
PRC Comment Policy
Your comments MUST BE constructive with vivid and clear suggestion relating to the post.
Your comments MUST NOT be less than 5 words.
Do NOT in any way copy/duplicate or transmit another members comment and paste to earn. Members who indulge themselves copying and duplicating comments, their earnings would be wiped out totally as a warning and Account deactivated if the user continue the act.
Parrot Coin does not pay for exclamatory comments Such as hahaha, nice one, wow, congrats, lmao, lol, etc are strictly forbidden and disallowed. Kindly adhere to this rule.
Constructive REPLY to comments is allowed