- VanEck misrepresents Bitcoin’s supply cap, omitting that it’s conditional on transaction fees, which are currently minimal.
- Bitcoin’s reliance on issuance and underwhelming Lightning Network adoption contradict claims of a strict supply limit.
- Unlike Bitcoin, Ethereum’s reduced issuance supports its position as a valuable digital asset in the market.
VanEck’s marketing claims that Bitcoin’s fixed supply sets it apart, especially since Ethereum doesn’t have a similar limit. However, this report misrepresents how Bitcoin’s supply actually works. Investors deserve clarity, yet the promotional materials fail to mention that the 21 million supply cap is conditional on transaction fees. Currently, transaction fees contribute only 1-2% of miners’ revenue, making this a critical omission.
The Conditional Nature of Bitcoin’s Supply Cap
Adriano Feria highlights a glaring issue with VanEck’s promotional content. It implies that the 21 million supply cap is absolute. However, the reality is far more complex. The supply cap can only be maintained if transaction fees increase significantly.
This lack of openness is deceptive and may cause confusion for prospective investors. Furthermore, the marketing materials fail to mention that 98–99% of miners’ income comes from the issue subsidy of Bitcoin.
Besides, VanEck’s claims about Bitcoin’s finite supply are akin to advertising a non-stop flight while failing to mention that most of the fuel has been depleted. This analogy underscores the misleading nature of their marketing approach. BTC’s dependency on issuance remains high.
Consequently, the scaling solution, the Lightning Network, has struggled to gain traction, with less than 0.025% of BTC operating on it. This reality contradicts the notion of Bitcoin as a digital currency with a strict supply limit.
The Comparison with Ethereum
Moreover, BTC and ETH are not merely digital currencies; they compete as money-like assets. Ethereum has achieved net deflationary issuance since the Merge, creating an environment that supports native yield.
This starkly contrasts with Bitcoin’s approach, which continues to rely heavily on issuance. Additionally, Ethereum’s framework extends beyond currency, positioning Ether as its effective native digital currency.
Investors must be better informed about the dynamics that influence the value propositions of both BTC and ETH. Transparency in marketing is essential for fostering informed investment decisions. The Bitcoin community can guarantee a more informed investor base by making these important points clear.
Disclaimer and Risk Warning
This article is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. Crypto News Land does not endorse or is responsible for any content, quality, products, advertising, products, accuracy or any other materials on this article. This content does not reflect the views of Crypto News Land, nor is it intended to be used for legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Crypto News Land will not be held responsible for image copyright matters. Readers are advised to always do your own research before making any significant decisions.
The post Is Bitcoin’s Supply Cap Just a Mirage? The Truth Behind VanEck’s Marketing appeared first on Crypto News Land.
Earn more PRC tokens by sharing this post. Copy and paste the URL below and share to friends, when they click and visit Parrot Coin website you earn: https://parrotcoin.net0
PRC Comment Policy
Your comments MUST BE constructive with vivid and clear suggestion relating to the post.
Your comments MUST NOT be less than 5 words.
Do NOT in any way copy/duplicate or transmit another members comment and paste to earn. Members who indulge themselves copying and duplicating comments, their earnings would be wiped out totally as a warning and Account deactivated if the user continue the act.
Parrot Coin does not pay for exclamatory comments Such as hahaha, nice one, wow, congrats, lmao, lol, etc are strictly forbidden and disallowed. Kindly adhere to this rule.
Constructive REPLY to comments is allowed