Ripple Vs SEC: Lawyer Highlights Why SEC Challenges XRP Futures In Bitnomial Case

Ripple SEC XRP Futures Bitnomial Case XRP lawsuit

The Ripple Vs SEC battle has further intensified with Bitnomial revealing key updates recently. Notably, the Bitnomial Exchange has recently sued the US SEC as the agency claims that the XRP Futures are “Security Futures.” However, amid this, pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan has shed light on the key reasons why the agency has continued its harsh stance against XRP in the Bitnomial case.

Ripple Vs SEC: Why SEC Continues To Target XRP?

Bitnomial has continued to advance with its strategic plan despite the latest legal hurdles and the ongoing tensions in the Ripple Vs SEC case. In a recent announcement, the exchange revealed the upcoming launch of its perpetual futures platform, Botanical.

The platform, backed by Ripple with a $25 million funding round, aims to provide a flurry of trading options like futures, crypto derivatives, and others, to users. Besides, the firm also said that Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse will join its board, which has further fueled speculations in the crypto market.

Meanwhile, Ripple’s involvement in the funding has further fueled discussions about the SEC’s motives in targeting Bitnomial. Some critics argue that the agency’s scrutiny of Bitnomial’s XRP futures is a calculated move to undermine Ripple’s growing influence.

One social media user pointed out that every company working with XRP seems to be under the SEC’s radar. His comment reflects the agency’s actions, which may be more about hindering Ripple’s progress than protecting investors.

However, pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan weighed in on this viewpoint. He highlighted that Ripple’s backing of Bitnomial has created a strong incentive for the crypto giant to support Bitnomial in its legal battle. He noted that the SEC’s aggressive stance could be part of a broader strategy to stifle Ripple’s growth through associated businesses like Bitnomial.

What’s Next In XRP Lawsuit?

The Bitnomial case has gained more attention as the US SEC has recently filed an appeal in the XRP lawsuit. The Ripple Vs SEC case was one of the high-profile and long-running legal battles in the crypto sector.

Amid this, the recent appeal by the agency has sparked discussions in the market, with many slamming the SEC for extending the case. However, Ripple has also filed a cross-appeal, indicating its confidence in the ongoing legal fight. Besides, Ripple CLO has also commented on the XRP lawsuit and its potential future developments.

Meanwhile, amid this, Grayscale has filed to covert its Solana, XRP, and AVAX Trust into ETF offerings. This move, despite the US SEC targeting Ripple’s native crypto, showcases the firm’s confidence in the blockchain firm and its native crypto. Besides, Ripple has also revealed major updates on its stablecoin RLUSD, which have fueled speculations in the market.

However, XRP price was down 1.5% today to $0.5384, with its trading volume soaring 9% to $1.22 billion. The crypto has touched a high of $0.5475 and a low of $0.5327 in the last 24 hours. Furthermore, XRP Futures Open Interest also fell 2% to $747.94 million.

The post Ripple Vs SEC: Lawyer Highlights Why SEC Challenges XRP Futures In Bitnomial Case appeared first on CoinGape.


Earn more PRC tokens by sharing this post. Copy and paste the URL below and share to friends, when they click and visit Parrot Coin website you earn: https://parrotcoin.net0


PRC Comment Policy

Your comments MUST BE constructive with vivid and clear suggestion relating to the post.

Your comments MUST NOT be less than 5 words.

Do NOT in any way copy/duplicate or transmit another members comment and paste to earn. Members who indulge themselves copying and duplicating comments, their earnings would be wiped out totally as a warning and Account deactivated if the user continue the act.

Parrot Coin does not pay for exclamatory comments Such as hahaha, nice one, wow, congrats, lmao, lol, etc are strictly forbidden and disallowed. Kindly adhere to this rule.

Constructive REPLY to comments is allowed

Leave a Reply