The Solana ETF launch has been one of the widely discussed topics in the crypto town now, especially after Bitcoin and Ethereum Spot ETF trading started this year in the US. However, according to recent social media posts from Bloomberg analysts, the investment instrument of SOL faces major hurdles as the US SEC appears to have failed to acknowledge the filings. This development has triggered debits over whether the crypto should be classified as a security or not.

Solana ETF Launch In Jeopardy

The recent removal of Solana ETF filings by VanEck and 21Shares underscores the growing uncertainty surrounding the SEC’s stance on cryptocurrencies. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, in a recent X post, highlighted that the filings did not progress beyond the second step due to the SEC’s lack of acknowledgment.

As a result, the exchanges had to pull their 19b-4 filings, effectively halting the approval process. Balchunas pointed out that the chances of approval are slim unless there is a shift in the SEC’s leadership. It’s worth noting that speculations soar in the US market with recent reports suggesting that Kamala Harris will likely appoint SEC Chair Gary Gensler to lead the Treasury Department under her presidency.

Meanwhile, this situation has fueled ongoing debates about SOL’s classification as a security. A social media user argued that it is inconsistent to classify the crypto as a security while Ethereum is not.

In response, Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart noted that the SEC is indeed making this argument in both courts and public forums. This comment has further fueled concerns over the potential launch of the SOL exchange-traded funds.

Adding to the complexity, the recent disappearance of the Solana ETF filings from the Cboe website has raised eyebrows. VanEck and 21Shares initially filed for a Spot Solana ETF in June, following the SEC’s approval of nine spot Ethereum ETFs. However, the removal of their 19b-4 filings has cast doubt on the future of the ETF approval.

VanEck Remains Optimistic On Potential Launch

Despite the regulatory challenges, VanEck remains optimistic about the approval of its Solana ETF. VanEck’s Head of Digital Asset Research, Matthew Sigel recently expressed confidence in SOL’s classification as a commodity, similar to Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Sigel cited evolving legal perspectives to support his stance, emphasizing that certain assets can be viewed as both securities and commodities, depending on the context. Notably, his view reflects a broader legal debate on how crypto assets should be regulated.

Meanwhile, he argued that while some assets might function as securities in primary markets, they may behave more like commodities in secondary markets. This nuanced perspective could play a crucial role in shaping future regulatory approaches to cryptocurrencies like SOL.

Notably, SOL price traded was up around 1% during the writing and exchanged hands at $144.14, with its trading volume rising 5% to $2.16 billion. Notably, the crypto has touched a high of $148.65 and a low of $141.36 in the last 24 hours. Meanwhile, a recent Solana price analysis showed that the crypto might face hurdles to hit $200, citing several conditions.

The post Solana ETF Launch Hits Roadblock As US SEC Sparks SOL’s Security Debate appeared first on CoinGape.

Earn more PRC tokens by sharing this post. Copy and paste the URL below and share to friends, when they click and visit Parrot Coin website you earn: https://parrotcoin.net0

PRC Comment Policy

Your comments MUST BE constructive with vivid and clear suggestion relating to the post.

Your comments MUST NOT be less than 5 words.

Do NOT in any way copy/duplicate or transmit another members comment and paste to earn. Members who indulge themselves copying and duplicating comments, their earnings would be wiped out totally as a warning and Account deactivated if the user continue the act.

Parrot Coin does not pay for exclamatory comments Such as hahaha, nice one, wow, congrats, lmao, lol, etc are strictly forbidden and disallowed. Kindly adhere to this rule.

Constructive REPLY to comments is allowed