Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has publicly criticized Brad Garlinghouse, the chief executive of Ripple.
Hoskinson’s comments were aimed at Garlinghouse’s support for advancing crypto legislation in the United States, even if the rules are not viewed as perfect by all industry participants.
Dispute Over Crypto Regulation Strategy
At the center of the disagreement is how the crypto industry should engage with lawmakers. Garlinghouse and Ripple have argued that passing clearer rules is better than continued regulatory uncertainty. Several major firms, including exchanges and stablecoin issuers, have backed this approach.
Hoskinson, however, questioned whether supporting such legislation could hand too much power to regulators who previously took enforcement action against crypto companies.
Ripple’s Legal History Shapes Its View
Ripple spent years fighting a high-profile lawsuit brought by U.S. regulators, a legal battle that cost the company hundreds of millions of dollars. Supporters of Ripple say that experience explains why Garlinghouse is pushing for clearer laws to avoid a repeat of what the industry faced in the past.
They also note that Ripple and other large firms have invested heavily in lobbying efforts to shape crypto regulation in Washington.
Industry Not United on the Issue
The dispute shows a broader split within crypto. Some companies believe compromise is necessary to protect digital assets and provide long-term certainty. Others argue that weak or rushed laws could create new risks.
Hoskinson suggested that the debate is being framed too narrowly, saying the issue goes beyond one company or one executive and reflects deeper disagreements about the future of crypto regulation.
A Sign of Growing Tensions
While the exchange has drawn attention on social media, it also shows rising tensions as governments move closer to setting firm rules for digital assets.
As policymakers weigh new legislation, disagreements among industry leaders like Hoskinson and Garlinghouse show that crypto’s next phase may be shaped as much by internal debate as by regulatory action.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Earn more PRC tokens by sharing this post. Copy and paste the URL below and share to friends, when they click and visit Parrot Coin website you earn: https://parrotcoin.net0
PRC Comment Policy
Your comments MUST BE constructive with vivid and clear suggestion relating to the post.
Your comments MUST NOT be less than 5 words.
Do NOT in any way copy/duplicate or transmit another members comment and paste to earn. Members who indulge themselves copying and duplicating comments, their earnings would be wiped out totally as a warning and Account deactivated if the user continue the act.
Parrot Coin does not pay for exclamatory comments Such as hahaha, nice one, wow, congrats, lmao, lol, etc are strictly forbidden and disallowed. Kindly adhere to this rule.
Constructive REPLY to comments is allowed